Brokerages are adding workflow layers to enhance coordination without replacing their established AMS, addressing inefficiencies in their processes.
After nearly two decades of experience in agency operations, I recognize that many frustrations with agency management systems (AMS) stem from an oversight of the system's true capabilities. It's not uncommon for brokerages to misjudge what these systems can do, leading to inefficiencies that compound over time. This misunderstanding often snowballs into operational challenges, which can hinder overall productivity.
Purpose of the AMS
Agency management systems excel in their core functions: maintaining records, storing policy information, and organizing account histories. For most brokerages, the AMS serves as the foundational tool, delivering essential reporting that supports decision-making. Beyond mere functionalities, these systems are meant to be the backbone of an agency's operations, providing a single source of truth for vital business information. However, complications arise when brokerages expect the AMS to handle comprehensive coordination tasks, which can lead to a mismatch between expectations and deliverables.
Identifying the Coordination Challenge
When brokerages burden their AMS with trying to manage handoffs, track task ownership, and monitor deadlines, they often encounter limitations. It's not just about tracking tasks—it's about ensuring that everyone is on the same page. To fill these gaps, teams typically resort to developing their own informal solutions—spreadsheets, shared email accounts, and personal tracking applications. While these methods might work for individual users, they create confusion and inefficiencies as teams expand.
This discrepancy becomes evident in integration processes where identical management systems yield varied operational pathways. For instance, one agency might fully utilize its AMS for documentation and workflow coordination, while another may heavily rely on emails and individual memory for renewal calendars and follow-ups. Although both approaches might appear effective short-term, they are not sustainable. The latter method incurs significant costs as the volume of accounts increases. When coordination relies on personal memory, bottlenecks can emerge unnoticed, leading to dropped handoffs and slow renewals. It compounds over time, creating a hidden drag on performance.
Augmenting the Core System
Brokerages that choose to layer additional workflow systems do so to streamline coordination around their AMS, which they have often invested significant resources into. This added workflow layer is designed specifically to solve coordination issues beyond the AMS's primary record-keeping capabilities. It enables teams to assign tasks, track their status, and highlight overdue actions—all while preserving the AMS as the central system of record.
When these systems function effectively in tandem, the outcomes can be significant. Data stored within the AMS becomes connected to a more transparent and assignable workflow. Tasks transition smoothly through defined stages, with clear accountability at each juncture. Each touchpoint becomes an opportunity for better communication and clarity among team members. Consequently, when a task requires review, the system provides a precise account of what has transpired throughout the process. This level of visibility often leads to faster decision-making and reduced time spent on resolving uncertainties.
Practical Implications of Enhanced Workflows
The most noticeable improvements manifest in frequently executed workflows, such as renewals, proposals, policy checks, and certificate requests—areas where informal systems can heavily impede productivity. Consider the renewals process: if it’s managed informally, small missteps can lead to large issues—missed deadlines, lost clients, and, ultimately, decreased revenue.
By defining and structuring these processes, teams can redirect their focus toward completing tasks rather than managing the chaos of informal systems. Senior account managers can concentrate on client relations instead of spending time resolving miscommunications in handoffs. Leadership gains valuable insights into workload distribution and identifies areas where delays might be occurring. That visibility can help in making data-driven decisions about staffing and resource allocation, which is often where agencies can either thrive or struggle.
My observations indicate that this shift can significantly affect operational capacity for teams contemplating headcount increases. More often than not, throughput challenges are visibility issues. Introducing a structured workflow improves operational performance without necessitating alterations to the AMS, which remains unchanged. Instead, surrounding processes become more manageable, creating the improvements that matter most. It's about enhancing what you already have rather than overhauling your entire system.
Future Outlook: The Importance of Adaptive Strategies
As the insurance market continues to evolve, aligning workflows with emerging technologies and changing client expectations remains vital. Brokerages will need to stay ahead of the curve, evolving their strategies in response to both operational needs and client demands. What this means for you is that adapting your AMS and surrounding processes isn't just about short-term fixes; it's a long-term strategic play.
Looking ahead, there's an increasing focus on integration capabilities, real-time reporting, and analysis features that are becoming standard in the market. If agencies ignore this trend, they risk falling behind more agile competitors. (And this is the part most people overlook.) By investing in workflow enhancements that complement the AMS, brokerages can not only survive but thrive, ensuring they remain responsive to changes in the market. This is more significant than it looks—it's about future-proofing your agency.
Kathryn Lerch is an Insurance Solutions Engineer at Fulcrum, specializing in AI-driven workflow solutions tailored for insurance brokerages. With 18 years of experience in optimizing service workflows and managing operational efficiencies across multiple agency locations, her insight is crucial for navigating complex integrations.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.